<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should all CG films go 3D?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reelperspectives.com/archives/should-all-cg-films-go-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reelperspectives.com/archives/should-all-cg-films-go-3d/</link>
	<description>real thoughts on reel experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:34:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Schnese</title>
		<link>http://www.reelperspectives.com/archives/should-all-cg-films-go-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Schnese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reelperspectives.com/?p=59#comment-380</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see that test footage. As I said in my post, &quot;9&quot; was just begging for it to be presented in 3D. 
 
How does the Legend Films process compare to what PIXAR is doing with Toy Story 1 &amp; 2? From what John Lasseter told the Wall Street Journal their process from the Original source was able to be cranked out super fast (&quot;...We&#039;ve always been making 3D films, we&#039;ve just been looking at them with one eye closed...&quot;). It&#039;s sounds like Legend Films does a more hands on, manual conversion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d love to see that test footage. As I said in my post, &quot;9&quot; was just begging for it to be presented in 3D. </p>
<p>How does the Legend Films process compare to what PIXAR is doing with Toy Story 1 &amp; 2? From what John Lasseter told the Wall Street Journal their process from the Original source was able to be cranked out super fast (&quot;&#8230;We&#039;ve always been making 3D films, we&#039;ve just been looking at them with one eye closed&#8230;&quot;). It&#039;s sounds like Legend Films does a more hands on, manual conversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Sandrew</title>
		<link>http://www.reelperspectives.com/archives/should-all-cg-films-go-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Sandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reelperspectives.com/?p=59#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Chris,  Actually there is an awesome 3D conversion test of &quot;9&quot; produced by Legend Films (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legendfilms.com).&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.legendfilms.com).&lt;/a&gt;  Unfortunately Focus Features requested the test less than two months prior to the 9/9/09 release date.  Consequently, there wasn&#039;t enough time for Legend Films to convert the whole film.  Given another 2 to 3 weeks and it could have been completed.  The test is going to be screened for the first time at the 3D Summit on Wednesday, 9/16/09. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,  Actually there is an awesome 3D conversion test of &quot;9&quot; produced by Legend Films (<a href="http://www.legendfilms.com)." target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.legendfilms.com)" rel="nofollow">http://www.legendfilms.com)</a>.  Unfortunately Focus Features requested the test less than two months prior to the 9/9/09 release date.  Consequently, there wasn&#039;t enough time for Legend Films to convert the whole film.  Given another 2 to 3 weeks and it could have been completed.  The test is going to be screened for the first time at the 3D Summit on Wednesday, 9/16/09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
